Letting people go
Question of employment. I for one think that being a permanent (full time) employee with a tenure of service to a company guarantees job security. It's always the responsibility of the company to make sure to have work for their employees -- an employee who has nothing to work on is not at fault. And I think its unjust to terminate an employee just because the company has no work to give unless the company is downsizing to break even, going bankrupt, or the company is just not earning. But as long as it's revenue is higher than expenses, they darn must have a good reason, a really valid one to let people go. It would be really demoralizing to hire and fire the same people at a very short span of time without even knowing their potentials. Again is it done for a valid reason?
Some say "Being in the driver's seat is different from being at the backseat". OK, I may not see what others may see but you don't need to be an astrophysics to see what is practically right and wrong.
0 comments :
Post a Comment